# Question

The indexed nested-loop join algorithm described in Section 13.5.3 can be inefficient if the index is a secondary index, and there are multiple tuples with the same value for the join attributes. Why is it inefficient? Describe a way, using sorting, to reduce the cost of retrieving tuples of the inner relation. Underwhat conditions would this algorithm be more efficient than hybrid merge–join?

## Answer to relevant Questions

Estimate the number of block accesses required by your solution to Exercise for r1 Θ r2, where r1 and r2 are as defined in Exercise.Design sorting based and hashing algorithms for computing the division operation.Show how to derive the following equivalences by a sequence of transformations using the equivalence rules in Section 14.3.1. a. σθ1 ∧ θ2 ∧ θ3 (E) = σθ1 (σθ2 ...Describe how to incrementally maintain the results of the following operations, on both insertions and deletions.a. Union and set differenceb. Left outer joinConsider the following two transactions: T1: read (A); read (B); if A = 0then B: = B + 1; write (B). T2: read (B); read (A); if B = 0 then A: = A + 1; write (A). Let the consistency requirement be A = 0 ∨ B = 0, ...Post your question

0