The IRS contacted your client as part of an examination of its tax return and proposed that the client owes an extra $100,000. As the client’s tax accountant and a CPA, can you agree to handle the matter for 40 percent of what you save the client? Under what circumstances might this be an acceptable form of payment for services rendered and when might it be unacceptable and in violation of the AICPA rules and/or SSTS? Notwithstanding the AICPA rules and SSTSs, is there anything ethically improper with agreeing to handle the matter for 40 percent of what you save the client?
Answer to relevant QuestionsA large, national accounting firm decides it is time to outsource the preparation of income tax returns to an organization in India that has performed outsource services for other U.S. CPA firms. The firm will transmit ...1. Assume that both Popperson and Snow are CPAs. Do you think Snow violated his confidentiality obligation under the AICPA Code by informing Popperson about the faulty equipment at CSM? Why or why not. As a licensed CPA ...1. Who are the stakeholders in this case and what are their interests?2. What are Kolb’s ethical obligations with respect to the Medicare fraud and her reporting it within Valley View under the AICPA Code of Professional ...The following statement expresses the conclusion of XYZ auditors with respect to the company’s investment in ABC. Assume that all amounts are material. What kind of audit opinion should be rendered given this statement? ...What do you think is meant by the term ethical auditing with respect to principles and rules of professional conduct in the AICPA Code?
Post your question