The new anti-bribery prosecution regime involves serious charges and penalties for bribery in foreign countries during past times when many people were bribing in the normal course of international business, and penalties were not levied. Is it unreasonable to levy extremely high fines at the beginning of the new regime, and/or not to limit the period over which bribery can trigger those fines? Why and why not?
Answer to relevant QuestionsIt seems likely that the top executives of the major banks involved in the manipulation of the LIBOR rate were unaware of the manipulations, and of the massive profits and losses caused by those manipulations. Why did they ...1. Where were Wal-Mart’s questionable payments made, and where did this result in serious damage to the company and its executives? Why?2. The “gestores” payments were made to third parties, who then bribed local ...Commuters who have more than one passenger in the car are permitted to drive in a special lane on some highways while all the other motorists have to contend with stop-and-go traffic. Does this have anything to do with ...Why should directors, executives, and accountants understand consequentialism, deontology, and virtue ethics?From a virtue ethics perspective, why would it be logical to put in place a manufacturing process beyond legal requirements?
Post your question