Question: The Personal Responsibility and Work Opportunity Reconciliation Act of 1996
The Personal Responsibility and Work Opportunity Reconciliation Act of 1996 imposed limits on the amount of time that a family could receive cash welfare payments during its members’ childhoods. Groggier and Michalopoulos (2003) found that these time limits led to immediate reductions in the number of people receiving welfare benefits, even though nobody in the family had reached his or her time limit. Which group of families should be particularly sensitive to the introduction of these time limits: those with younger children or those with older children? Explain your answer.
Answer to relevant QuestionsJackie spends her money on food and all other goods. Right now, she has an income of $600 per month. Compare two alternative welfare programs in which she could participate: program A would provide her with a monthly check ...Suppose that the U.S. personal income tax system became a “flat tax” system, in which all taxpayers paid a certain percentage of their incomes in tax, and in which there are no exemptions or deductions. In which way(s) ...The government of Utopia plans to offer a transportation tax credit in which families receive a share of their expenditures on transportation to and from work or school as a reduction in their tax bill. Utopia is considering ...The demand for rutabagas is Q = 2,000 – 100P and the supply of rutabagas is Q = –100 + 200P. Who bears the statutory incidence of a $2 per unit tax on the sale of rutabagas? Who bears the economic incidence of this tax? The elasticity of demand for maracas is –2.0 and the elasticity of supply is 3.0. How much will the price of maracas change with a per-unit tax of $2? Who bears the larger burden of the tax, consumers or producers?
Post your question