The set of IP addresses from 126.96.36.199 to 188.8.131.52 has been aggregated to 184.108.40.206/17. However, there is a gap of 1024 unassigned addresses from 220.127.116.11 to 18.104.22.168 that are now suddenly assigned to a host using a different outgoing line. Is it now necessary to split up the aggregate address into its constituent blocks, add the new block to the table, and then see if any reaggregation is possible? If not, what can be done instead?
Answer to relevant QuestionsA router has the following (CIDR) entries in its routing table: Address/mask Next hop 22.214.171.124/22 Interface 0 126.96.36.199/22 Interface 1 188.8.131.52/23 Router 1 Default Router 2 For ...Most IP datagram reassembly algorithms have a timer to avoid having a lost fragment tie up reassembly buffers forever. Suppose that a datagram is fragmented into four fragments. The first three fragments arrive, but the last ...In the model underlying Fig. 6-4, it is assumed that packets may be lost by the network layer and thus must be individually acknowledged. Suppose that the network layer is 100 percent reliable and never loses packets. What ...Out of curiosity, the implementer of the transport entity of Fig. 6-20 has decided to put counters inside the sleep procedure to collect statistics about the conn array. Among these are the number of connections in each of ...What is the total size of the minimum TCP MTU, including TCP and IP overhead but not including data link layer overhead?
Post your question