The transnational strategy is often seen as one way in which firms can avoid the limitations inherent in the local responsiveness/international integration trade-off. However, given the obvious advantages of being both locally responsive and internationally integrated, why are apparently only a relatively few firms implementing a transnational strategy?
Answer to relevant QuestionsConcerning external analysis and internal analysis, if the order of importance is not important, why not?Do firms with the following financial results have below normal, normal, or above normal economic performance?a. ROA = 14.3%, WACC = 12.8%b. ROA = 4.3%, WACC = 6.7%c. ROA = 6.5%, WACC = 9.2%d. ROA = 8.3%, WACC = 8.3%Opportunities analysis seems to suggest that there are strategic opportunities in almost any industry, including declining ones. If that is true, is it fair to say that there is really no such thing as an unattractive ...Can a firm’s transnational strategy be a source of sustained competitive advantage?Your firm has decided to begin selling its mining machinery products in Ghana. Unfortunately, there is not a highly developed trading market for currency in Ghana. However, Ghana does have significant exports of cocoa. ...
Post your question