There has been a long-standing debate regarding the existence of a "value-growth" anomaly in financial economic research. Previous studies have shown that value stocks (i.e., stocks with low price-to-book ratios) have higher returns than growth stocks (i.e., stocks with high price-to-book ratios) in the United States and markets around the world, even after adjusting for a market-wide risk factor. What are some possible explanations for why value stocks might outperform growth stocks on a risk-adjusted basis? Is this value-growth "anomaly" consistent with the existence of an efficient stock market?
Answer to relevant QuestionsDescribe the difference between a price momentum strategy and an earnings momentum strategy. Under what conditions would you expect the two approaches to produce similar portfolios?Global Advisers Company (GAC) is an SEC-registered investment counseling firm involved solely in managing international securities portfolios. After much research on the developing economy and capital markets of the country ...Given a change in the level of interest rates, discuss how two major factors will influence the relative change in price for individual bonds.Discuss the difference between a foreign bond (e.g., a Samurai) and a Eurobond (e.g., a Euroyen issue).We discussed three alternative hypotheses to explain the term structure of interest rates. Briefly discuss the three hypotheses, and indicate which one you think best explains the alternative shapes of a yield curve.
Post your question