Thomas Huskin and his wife entered into a con-tract to have their home remodeled by House Medic Handyman Service. Todd Hall signed the contract as an authorized representative of House Medic. It turned out that House Medic was a fictitious name for Hall Hauling, Ltd. The contract did not indicate this, however, and Hall did not inform the Huskins about Hall Hauling. When a contract dispute later arose, the Huskins sued Todd Hall per-sonally for breach of contract. Can Hall be held personally liable? Why or why not?
Answer to relevant QuestionsBasic Research, L. L. C., advertised its products on television networks owned by Rainbow Media Holdings, Inc., through an ad agency, Icebox Advertising, Inc. As Basic’s agent, Icebox had the express authority to buy ads ...Onyx applies for work with Precision Design Company, which tells her that it requires union membership as a condition of employment. She applies for work with Quality Engineering, Inc., which does not require union ...THE ETHICAL DIMENSIONCould Morales-Cruz’s dean have had legitimate reasons for changing his mind about the one-year extension? If so, what might they have been? THE LEGAL ENVIRONMENT DIMENSIONWhat steps should employers ...Michael Sark operated a logging business as a sole proprietorship. To acquire equipment for the business, Sark and his wife, Paula, borrowed funds from Quality Car & Truck Leasing, Inc. When his business encountered ...1. What did the partnership agreement at the center of this case require on the death of a partner and the dissolution of the firm? 2. What conduct by which parties triggered this litigation? 3. On what did the court based ...
Post your question