To secure a loan, Rubin pledges stock that he represents as being marketable and worth approximately $1.7 million. In fact, the stock is nonmarketable and practically worthless. He is charged with violating the Securities Act of 1933. He claims that because no sale occurred, he is not guilty. Is he correct? Why or why not?
Answer to relevant QuestionsWhat are three defenses that might be used by a party charged with violating the Securities Act of 1933? You and a former classmate started a computer software company five years ago. Originally, the two of you were the owners and only employees. The foundation of your company was your combined expertise in creating ...Discuss the concept of “discharge” as used in bankruptcy law. What types of debts are not dischargeable? Explain. The regulation of deceptive trade practices under Section 5 of the FTC Act, the disclosures required by the Truth-in-Lending Act, and the provisions of many other consumer protection laws aimed at helping consumers by ...(a) Who has the primary responsibility for nontoxic solid waste disposal? (b) Describe the role of the Solid Waste Disposal Act in waste disposal.
Post your question