Two city councilors are debating whether to pursue a new project. Councilor Miles says it is only “worth it” to society if suppliers lower their costs to the city for the inputs to the project. Councilor Squeaky disagrees, and says it doesn’t matter—society is no better off with these cost concessions than it would be without the concessions. Where do you stand? Explain.
Answer to relevant QuestionsFor your senior thesis, you polled your classmates, asking them, “How much would you be willing to pay to double the amount of parking on campus?” Based on their responses, you estimated that your fellow students were ...One approach to calculating the value of life involves the use of compensating differential studies. What informational problems make these studies difficult to carry out? In a recent study, Americans stated that they were willing to pay $70 billion to protect all endangered species and also stated that they were willing to pay $15 billion to protect a single species. Which problem with ...Figlio (1999) found that legislators are more likely to mirror their constituents’ preferences during election years than in earlier years of their terms. This is particularly true for relatively inexperienced legislators. ...Some have argued that diversity in communities and schools leads to positive externalities. What implications does this view have for the efficiency of a Tiebout equilibrium? What implications does it have for government ...
Post your question