Question

Two police officers were patrolling an area where drug trafficking had been reported. They spotted an automobile driven by Johnson circling in the area and observed that the car had a broken taillight. The officers pulled the vehicle over and advised Johnson that he was being stopped for the broken taillight, which violated a state statute. The officer then discovered that Johnson was driving with a suspended driver’s license. He was placed under arrest and given a pat-down search. This search revealed crack cocaine in the defendant’s pocket; a search of the trunk revealed that marijuana was present. Johnson asked the court for a motion to suppress the evidence on the grounds that the police officers had no right to stop and search his vehicle for a broken taillight. Was Johnson correct?


$1.99
Sales0
Views42
Comments0
  • CreatedSeptember 15, 2015
  • Files Included
Post your question
5000