Two police officers were patrolling an area where drug trafficking had been reported. They spotted an automobile driven by Johnson circling in the area and observed that the car had a broken taillight. The officers pulled the vehicle over and advised Johnson that he was being stopped for the broken taillight, which violated a state statute. The officer then discovered that Johnson was driving with a suspended driver’s license. He was placed under arrest and given a pat-down search. This search revealed crack cocaine in the defendant’s pocket; a search of the trunk revealed that marijuana was present. Johnson asked the court for a motion to suppress the evidence on the grounds that the police officers had no right to stop and search his vehicle for a broken taillight. Was Johnson correct?
Answer to relevant QuestionsBower was encouraged by an acquaintance, who was actually an informer, to sell cocaine to a government undercover agent. The agent then arrested Bower for the possession and sale of a drug. Bower claimed entrapment as a ...Popovici, an untenured college English teacher, was being considered for a permanent appointment. When the president of the college discovered that she was separated from her husband and seeking a divorce, he brought this ...LeDoux, an emergency medical technician ( EMT), provided emergency medical attention to Julie Pachowitz at her residence. Because she was unresponsive and had poor vital signs, Pachowitz was taken to a hospital for ...A Native American tribe entered into a construction contract with C & L Enterprises ( C & L) to install a roof on a tribe- owned commercial building in Oklahoma. The property lies outside the tribe’s reservation. The ...Is it correct to say that a void contract and an unenforceable contract both refer to an agreement that has no legal existence?
Post your question