Under British law, a police officer must now say the following to a suspect placed under arrest: “You do not have to say anything. But if you do not mention now something which you later use in your defense, the court may decide that your failure to mention it now strengthens the case against you. A record will be made of anything you say and it may be given in evidence if you are brought to trial.” What is the goal of this British law? What does a police officer in the United States have to say, and what difference does it make at the time of an arrest? Which approach is better?
Answer to relevant QuestionsVan is brought to the police station for questioning about a shooting at a mall. The police read him his Miranda rights. For the rest of the three hour interrogation, he remains silent except for a few one word responses. ...John Stevens owned a dilapidated apartment that he rented to James and Cora Chesney for a low rent. The Chesneys began to remodel and rehabilitate the unit. Over a four-year period, they installed two new bathrooms, carpeted ...1. Which one of the following transactions is not governed by Article 2 of the UCC? (a) Purchasing an automobile for $35,000 (b) Leasing an automobile worth $35,000 (c) Purchasing a stereo worth $501 (d) Purchasing a stereo ...In the 2008 recession, Roger lost his job as a comptroller. Desperate for work after a year of unemployment, he began to apply for any accounting job at any company. But no one would hire him because he was “over-qualified ...FedEx refused to promote José Rodriguez to a supervisor’s position because of his accent and “how he speaks.” Is FedEx in violation of the law?
Post your question