Under current law, if your capital losses exceed your capital gains, you can deduct as much as $ 3,000 of losses against other forms of income. In the wake of massive declines in the stock market, in 2009 Senator Orrin Hatch suggested that figure be increased. Evaluate this proposal from the viewpoint of the Haig- Simons criterion. That is, would the proposal lead to an income tax base that is closer to or farther from the Haig- Simons ideal than the status quo?
Answer to relevant QuestionsThe New York Times published an article about a man who claimed that his tax rate was 102 per-cent of his income [Stewart, 2012]. He computed this figure by taking the ratio of his tax payments to his taxable income. Comment ...In 2012, Republican presidential candidate Mitt Romney proposed a decrease in the tax rates on dividends and capital gains for most taxpayers. Would these changes make sense in terms of the Haig- Simons definition of income? ...According to one econometric study, “Denmark and Sweden are on the wrong side of the Laffer curve for capital income taxation” [Trabandt and Uhlig, 2009]. Explain what the words “wrong side” mean in this context. Under US law, depreciation allowances are based on the original cost of acquiring the asset. No account is taken for the effects of inflation on the price level over time. a. How does inflation affect the real value of ...How would each of the following events affect the national debt as it is currently measured? a. The government borrows to finance a Memorial Day parade. b. The Statue of Liberty is sold to a group of private entrepreneurs. ...
Post your question