Question: Under federal laws firms in many agricultural industries can force
Under federal laws, firms in many agricultural industries can force all industry members to contribute to collective activities such as industry advertising if the majority agrees. Under the Beef Promotion and Research Act, all beef producers must pay a $ 1-per-head fee on cattle sold in the United States. This fee raises $ 80 million annually, which finances research, educational programs on mad cow disease, and collective advertising such as the 2012 campaign, “Stay Home. Grill Out.” Explain the logic of this law using the concepts of free riding and public goods. Supporters of this collective advertising estimate that producers receive $ 5.67 in additional marginal revenue for every dollar they contribute. If so, does this result suggest that there was a public good problem? Is the industry advertising optimally?
Answer to relevant QuestionsDoes an increase in average income cause a shift of the demand curve for avocados or a movement along the demand curve? Explain briefly.Do publishers sell the socially optimal number of managerial economics textbooks? Discuss in terms of public goods, rivalry, and exclusion. In the Managerial Solution example, who benefits and who loses from the invention? Does the innovating firm capture the full value of its innovation?Explain why gray markets reduce the ability of multinational firms to price discriminate.Why do antidumping policies limit the ability of firms to carry out international price discrimination?
Post your question