Using special software, South Dakota law enforcement officers found a person who appeared to possess child pornography at a specific Internet protocol address. The officers subpoenaed Midcontinent Communications, the service that assigned the address, for the personal information of its subscriber. With this information, the officers obtained a search warrant for the residence of John Rolfe, where they found a laptop that contained child pornography. Rolfe argued that the subpoenas violated his “expectation of privacy.” Did Rolfe have a privacy interest in the information obtained by the subpoenas issued to Midcontinent? Discuss.
Answer to relevant QuestionsDartmouth College professor M. Eric Johnson, in collaboration with Tiversa, Inc., a company that monitors peer- to- peer networks to provide security services, wrote an article titled “Data Hemorrhages in the Health- Care ...On March 13, 1963, Ernesto Miranda was arrested at his home for the kidnapping and rape of an eighteen-year-old woman. Miranda was taken to a Phoenix, Arizona, police station and questioned by two officers. Two hours later, ...WHAT IF THE FACTS WERE DIFFERENT? How might the result in this case have been different if the court had been different if the court had admitted Wagner’s evidence of the “Love Song” contract? THE LEGAL ENVIRONMENT ...1. Why did the court conclude that the parties in this case were not bound by the settlement and release documents signed by Gyabaah? 2. Why did Aronsky fail to deliver the signed documents to Rivlab or its insurer? 3. What ...To download a specific application (app) to your smartphone or tablet device, usually you have to check a box indicating that you agree to the company’s terms and conditions. Most individuals do so with-out ever reading ...
Post your question