Question

Voters rarely get to choose the exact level of spending on a public good. Instead, they are provided with two options—a proposed spending level posed by the government and a default (or “reversion”) level that would be enacted if the proposal were rejected by voters. The Leviathan theory suggests that governments will select intentionally large proposed spending levels and default levels that are well below the desired level of spending. Why is this behavior consistent with a size-maximizing government?


$1.99
Sales0
Views85
Comments0
  • CreatedApril 25, 2015
  • Files Included
Post your question
5000