We have sometimes heard investment managers say, "I followed that (expletive deleted) theory and bought high-beta stocks last year and they did worse than low-beta stocks. That theory is (expletive deleted)." Is this a valid test, and is this empirical evidence inconsistent with the theory?
Answer to relevant QuestionsA new theory has been proposed. The expected percentage increase in alcoholism in each city is equal to the rate of change in the price of gold plus the product of two terms. The first is the covariance of the percentage ...Referring to the results of Problem 1, illustrate the arbitrage opportunities that would exist if a portfolio called D with the following properties were observed: It has been suggested that the EMH could be used to determine whether you have monopoly access to a type of information. Explain how this might be done. The analyst who supplied you with the information in Problem 1 has just revised her forecast. She now realizes that the growth rate of 10% can continue for only five years, after which the company will have a long-term ...Given the following, does the law of one price hold? If not, what action should an investor take?
Post your question