We place our trust in authorities for many things, and when this trust is breached, we demand
Question:
An inquiry into the matter concluded that the operators did not have any formal training for the duties they were hired to do. They engaged in a number of improper operating practices, including failing to apply sufficient doses of chlorine, failing to monitor chlorine residuals daily, making false entries in the daily operating records, and misstating the locations at which water samples were taken. The operators were fully aware that these practices were unacceptable and contravened the Ministry of Environment guide- lines and directives.
At least seven people died from drinking the water contaminated with E. coli. These residents might have been saved if the Walkerton Public Utilities Commission had admitted sooner that the water was contaminated. In addition, about 2500 people became ill. An experimental drug in Phase III clinical trials, Synsorb Pk, was used to treat 19 children on compassionate grounds under Health Canada’s Special Access Program.
In spite of the fact that Ministry of Environment guidelines and directives existed before this tragedy, not to mention that the staff at Walkerton Public Utilities Commission failed to adhere to these guidelines, how much responsibility do you feel the provincial government had in this case? Also, comment on the decision to distribute the experimental drug to the 19 affected children.
Fantastic news! We've Found the answer you've been seeking!
Step by Step Answer:
Related Book For
Operations Management
ISBN: 978-0132687584
1st Canadian Edition
Authors: Jay Heizer, Barry Render, Paul Griffin
Question Posted: