What overall conclusions do you draw about why Barrett made the changes he did? Which issues were dominant? Why?
Answer to relevant QuestionsWhat pressures for change might face Barrett in the future? How do you arrive at this assessment? Now, compare and contrast the rationales in each article. Are there commonalities that emerge? Are some presented as more legitimate than others? In your opinion, why might this be the case? In your opinion, which of these changes were most successful? Why? Construct a change management strategy for dealing with this situation. In so doing, identify what approach(es) to managing resistance you recommend and provide a clear justification for your choice. What implications does this have for adopting a sense-making approach to organizational change?
Post your question