When asked if Apple would provide more details about Jobs’s second leave of absence, a company spokeswoman responded ‘we’ve said all we’re going to say.” Is Apple obligated to offer any more details, particularly about the health of its CEO? One lawyer who advises corporate boards on such questions says that such details are material to investment decisions only “if you’re asking shareholders to make decision based on [that] information .. You can’t expect the company,” he adds, “to give a blow-by-blow account of Steve Jobs’s health.” What do you think? If you were an Apple investor, what information would you regard as “material” to your decisions? What would you want to know in deciding whether to keep or sell your shares of Apple?
Answer to relevant QuestionsGive an example of a corporation following a single-product strategy, a related diversification strategy, and an unrelated diversification strategy. What level of performance would you expect from each firm, based on its ...Which strategy should a firm develop first—its business- level or its corporate-level strategy? Describe the relationship between a firm’s business- and corporate level strategies. Describe the difference between programmed and non-programmed decisions. What are the implications of these differences for decision makers? Interview a local business manager about a major decision that he or she made recently. Try to determine whether the manager used a rational decision-making process or whether behavioral elements were also present. If the ...What are the different sources of advice for entrepreneurs? What type of information would an entrepreneur be likely to get from each source? What are the drawbacks or limitations for each source?
Post your question