When auditor–client disputes arise during an audit engagement, another accounting firm is sometimes retained by the client and/or the existing auditor to provide an objective report on the issue at the center of the dispute as happened during Deloitte’s 1997 audit of Livent. Discuss an accounting firm’s responsibilities when it is retained to issue such a report.
Answer to relevant QuestionsDo you believe Deloitte & Touche should have approved Livent’s decision to record the $12.5 million “naming rights” payment as revenue during the third quarter of 1997? Defend your answer. What broad accounting ...Assess Grant Thornton’s decision to rely heavily on JGI’s delivery receipts when auditing the company’s prepaid inventory. More generally, compare and contrast the validity of audit evidence yielded by internally ...The AICPA has issued several Audit and Accounting Guides for specialized industries. Do auditors have a responsibility to refer to these guides when auditing clients in those industries? Do these guides override or replace ...Should audit firms accept “ethically challenged” companies and organizations as audit clients? Defend your answer.Most of Judge Lifland’s criticism of E&Y focused on the firm’s audit procedures for CBI’s accounts payable. Generally, what is the primary audit objective for accounts payable? Do you believe that E&Y’s two principal ...
Post your question