When the state of Virginia imposed stricter regulations on air pollution in 2003, it also authorized an auction of pollution permits, allowing some plants to emit larger amounts of ozone-depleting chemicals than would otherwise be allowed, and some to emit less. Theory predicts that this auction will lead to a socially efficient allocation of pollution. Describe how this outcome would occur.
Answer to relevant QuestionsCan an activity generate both positive and negative externalities at the same time? Explain your answer. Warrenia has two regions. In Oliviland, the marginal benefit associated with pollution cleanup is MB = 300 – 10Q, while in Linn eland, the marginal benefit associated with pollution cleanup is MB = 200 – 4Q. Suppose that ...Some people were concerned that the 1990 amendments to the Clean Air Act (CAA) would generate “hot spots” of pollution—localized areas with very high concentrations of pollutants. Why might the amendments lead to such ...Evans, Farrell, and Montgomery (1999) found evidence that workplace smoking bans substantially reduce overall rates of smoking, particularly for people with longer work weeks. Why should workplace smoking bans be ...Bill’s demand for hamburgers (a private good) is Q = 20 – 2P and Ted’s demand is Q = 10 – P. a. Write down an equation for the social marginal benefit of the consumption of hamburgers. b. Now suppose that hamburgers ...
Post your question