# Question: Why do we calculate s by dividing by n

Why do we calculate s by dividing by n – 1, rather than just n?

The reason is that if we divide by n - 1, then s2 is an unbiased estimator of σ2, the population variance. We want to show that s2 is an unbiased estimator of σ2, sigma squared. The mathematical proof that this is true is beyond the scope of an introductory statistics course, but we can use an example to demonstrate that it is. First we will use a very small population that consists only of these three numbers: 1, 2, and 5. You can determine that the population standard deviation, s, for this population is 1.699673 (or about 1.70), as show0n in the TI-84 output. So the population variance, sigma squared, σ2, is 2.888889 (or about 2.89). Now take all possible samples, with replacement, of size 2 from the population, and find the sample variance, s2, for each sample. This process is started for you in the table. Average these sample variances (s2), and you should get approximately 2.88889. If you do, then you have demonstrated that s2 is an unbiased estimator of σ2, sigma squared.

Show your work by filling in the accompanying table and show the average of s2.

The reason is that if we divide by n - 1, then s2 is an unbiased estimator of σ2, the population variance. We want to show that s2 is an unbiased estimator of σ2, sigma squared. The mathematical proof that this is true is beyond the scope of an introductory statistics course, but we can use an example to demonstrate that it is. First we will use a very small population that consists only of these three numbers: 1, 2, and 5. You can determine that the population standard deviation, s, for this population is 1.699673 (or about 1.70), as show0n in the TI-84 output. So the population variance, sigma squared, σ2, is 2.888889 (or about 2.89). Now take all possible samples, with replacement, of size 2 from the population, and find the sample variance, s2, for each sample. This process is started for you in the table. Average these sample variances (s2), and you should get approximately 2.88889. If you do, then you have demonstrated that s2 is an unbiased estimator of σ2, sigma squared.

Show your work by filling in the accompanying table and show the average of s2.

## Answer to relevant Questions

Refer to Exercise 10.9. This data table compares women who viewed high levels of television violence as children with those who did not in order to study the differences with regard to physical abuse of their partners as ...Refer to Exercise 10.9. The data table compares men who viewed high levels of television violence as children with those who did not, in order to study the differences with regard to physical abuse of their partners as ...Repeat the chi-square test (all four steps) from Exercise 10.23, but this time assume that you got exactly 20 outcomes in each of the six categories. Refer to the figure. Explain. The data table compares women who viewed television violence with those who did not, in order to study the differences in physical abuse of the spouse (Husemann et al. 2003). Test whether television violence and abusiveness ...A study was done to see whether participants would ignore a sign that said, "Elevator may stick between floors. Use the stairs." The people who used the stairs were said to be compliant, and those who used the elevator were ...Post your question