Question: Why should appellate courts not consider the evidence and reach
Why should appellate courts not consider the evidence and reach their own verdict and save the expense of another trial?
Answer to relevant QuestionsWhen are punitive damages awarded? What is the purpose of discovery and investigation? How is venue different from jurisdiction? Why would it be more appropriate to hire a paralegal than an attorney if an attorney is capable of performing the required work, attending court appearances, and bearing responsibility for any errors? Point for Discussion: Simon has no evidence that the truck contained anything legally owned by the megabank. He only has the statements of the old man and the note and cash. Should he report the details of the incident to ...
Post your question