Why take the time to develop separate REA diagrams for each business cycle if the ultimate objective is to combine them into one integrated enterprise-wide data model? Why not just focus on the integrated model from the start?
Answer to relevant QuestionsBuilding separate tables for every relationship (1:1, 1:N and M:N) does not violate any of the rules for building a well-structured database. Why then do you think that REA data modelers recommend building separate tables ...Refer to Problems 17.1 and 17.2 for information about the revenue and expenditure cycle activities for Joe’s ice-cream shop in order to draw an integrated REA diagram of both cycles.Explain how to calculate the total amount of Accounts Payable:How would you model the acquisition of a digital asset, such as the purchase of software online (the software is downloaded and then installed on the purchaser’s computer)?At Big Time University (BTU) students are allowed to purchase two basketball tickets for each home game. Each ticket contains the date of the game, and the seat information, such as section, row, and individual seat number. ...
Post your question