Question: You probably were startled to see the very neat relationships
You probably were startled to see the very neat relationships in Exercise 10.27. There was almost no variability about the regression line. I would, as a first approximation, guess that the relationship between television hours watched and standardized test performance would contain roughly as much scatter as the relationship between stress and symptoms, yet these data are far neater than the data in Figure 10.1. What might have caused this?
Answer to relevant QuestionsDraw a scatter diagram (of 10 points) on a sheet of paper that represents a moderately positive correlation between the variables. Now drop your pencil at random on this scatter diagram. (a) If you think of your pencil as a ...Using the data in Table 10.2, predict the Symptom score for a stress level of 45. In the text I have recommended against the use of stepwise procedures for multiple regression, whereby we systematically hunt among the variables to predict some sort of optimal equation. (a) Explain why I would make such a ...Since you have the DASL data on brain size, note that it also includes the variables of height and weight. Predict weight from height and sex and compare with the answer for Exercise 11.17. The state of Vermont is divided into 10 health-planning districts, which correspond roughly to counties. The following data represent the percentage of live births of babies weighing under 2,500 grams (Y), the fertility rate ...
Post your question