An article in Barron's noted the following.

Okay. Last fall, someone with a long memory and an even longer arm reached into that bureau drawer and came out with a moldy cheese sandwich and the equally moldy notion of corporate forecasts. However, the forecast proposal was dusted off, polished up and found quite serviceable. The U.S. SEC, indeed, lost no time in running it up the old flagpole-but no one was very eager to salute. Even after some of the more objectionable features-compulsory corrections and detailed explanations of why the estimates went awry-were peeled off the original proposal.

Seemingly, despite the Commission's smiles and sweet talk, those craven corporations were still afraid that an honest mistake would lead them down the primrose path to consent decrees and class action suits. To lay to rest such qualms, the Commission last week approved a "Safe Harbor" rule that, providing the forecasts were made on a reasonable basis and in good faith, protected corporations from litigation should the projections prove wide of the mark (as only about 99% are apt to do).

Instructions

a. What are the arguments for preparing profit forecasts?

b. What is the purpose of the "safe harbor" rule?

c. Why are corporations concerned about presenting profit forecasts?