Despite a lack of consensus among legal commentators, there is a clear answer to the debate about
Question:
1. How would you frame the issue and conclusion of this essay?
2. What ethical norms does the author primarily rely on in arguing for why judges should be elected?
3. Part of being a critical thinker is avoiding the temptation to dichotomize (look at everything as an either-or situation) and to look for other reasonable alternatives. Does the author engage in any dichotomous thinking? If so, what are other reasonable alternatives?
Clue: What either-or situations does the author create, and are there third and fourth possibilities?
4. Write an essay that someone who holds an opinion opposite to that of the essay author might write.
Clue: What other ethical norms could influence an opinion on this issue?
Fantastic news! We've Found the answer you've been seeking!
Step by Step Answer:
Related Book For
The Legal Environment of Business A Critical Thinking Approach
ISBN: 978-0132664844
6th Edition
Authors: Nancy K Kubasek, Bartley A Brennan, M Neil Browne
Question Posted: