In a landmark U.S. Supreme Court case, Price Waterhouse, CPAs v. Hopkins, a senior accountant was denied a promotion to partner at a major CPA firm because, according to one evaluation, she needed to "walk more femininely, talk more femininely, dress more femininely, wear make-up, have her hair styled, and wear jewelry." Others expressed more general criticisms that she was rude, impatient, and excessively demanding. When Ms. Hopkins sued under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, the CPA firm defended its actions, claiming that Ms. Hopkins' overly aggressive personality gave it sufficient grounds for denying her a promotion. Did the CPA firm commit sex discrimination?