In our example of the free-falling parachutist, we assumed that the acceleration due to gravity was a

Question:

In our example of the free-falling parachutist, we assumed that the acceleration due to gravity was a constant value of 9.8 m/s2. Although this is a decent approximation when we are examining falling objects near the surface of the earth, the gravitational force decreases as we move above sea level. A more general representation based on Newton’s inverse square law of gravitational attraction can be written as g(x) = g(0) R2/(r + x)2

Where g (x) = gravitational attraction at altitude x (in m) measured upwards from the earth’s surface (m/s2), g(0) = gravitational attraction at the earth’s surface (≡ 9.8 m/s2), and R = the earth’s radius (≡ 6.37 x 10m).

(a) In a fashion similar to the derivation of Eq. (1.9) use a force balance to derive a differential equation for velocity as a function of time that utilizes this more complete representation of gravitation. However, for this derivation, assume that upward velocity is positive.

(b) For the case where drag is negligible, use the chain rule to express the differential equation as a function of altitude rather than time. Recall that the chain rule is dv/dt = dv/dx dx/dt

(c) Use calculus to obtain from solution where υ = υ0­ at x = 0.

(d) Use Euler’s method to obtain a numerical solution from x = 0 to 100,000 m using a step of 10,000 m where the initial velocity is 1400 m/s upwards. Compute your result with the analytical solution.

Fantastic news! We've Found the answer you've been seeking!

Step by Step Answer:

Related Book For  book-img-for-question

Numerical Methods For Engineers

ISBN: 9780071244299

5th Edition

Authors: Steven C. Chapra, Raymond P. Canale

Question Posted: