Mr. Leopold applied to his provincial government for a student loan and was advanced $13 500. The loan agreement obligated the government to advance further funds midway through the school year. Mr. Leopold stopped attending classes in September for medical reasons but did not advise his university’s Student Services Office of this, contrary to a term in his loan agreement. He also used the funds for living expenses instead of for tuition, contrary to the loan agreement. The university determined that Mr. Leopold was not eligible for the second instalment of his loan, and the government therefore refused to advance it. Mr. Leopold sued the government for breach of contract and sought damages in the amount of $1.5 million. Do you think Mr. Leopold’s action should be successful? Why or why not?