Consider the geometric distributed model in equation (18.8), written in estimating equation form as in equation (18.11):

Question:

Consider the geometric distributed model in equation (18.8), written in estimating equation form as in equation (18.11):

yt = α0 + γzt + ryt–1 = vt,

where vt = ut – ρut–1.

(i) Suppose that you are only willing to assume the sequential exogeneity assumption in (18.6). Why is zt generally correlated with vt?

(ii) Explain why estimating (18.11) by IV, using instruments (zt, zt–1), is generally inconsistent under (18.6). Using the IV estimator, can you test whether zt and vt are correlated?

(iii) Evaluate the following proposal when only (18.6) holds: Estimate (18.11) by IV using instruments 1zt21, zt22 2.

(iv) Explain what you gain by estimating (18.11) by 2SLS using instruments (zt, zt–1, zt–2).

(v) In equation (18.16), the estimating equation for a rational distributed lag model, how would you estimate the parameters under (18.6) only? Might there be some practical problems with your approach?

Fantastic news! We've Found the answer you've been seeking!

Step by Step Answer:

Related Book For  book-img-for-question
Question Posted: