a. Locate the case at 336 P.3d 779.
b. What is the name of the case?
c. Which headnote indicates that the case holds that, contrary to the common law, a statutory dog bite claim does not require proof the owner knew or should have known the dog had dangerous propensities abnormal to its class?
d. What paragraph in the opinion does discussion of the topic in c. above begin?

Review volume 336 P.3d.