Discussion of the VSEPR model in Section 24.1 suggested a number of failures, in particular, in CaF

Question:

Discussion of the VSEPR model in Section 24.1 suggested a number of failures, in particular, in CaF2 and SrCl2, which (according to the VSEPR) should be linear but which are apparently bent, and in SeF2-6 and TeCl2−6, which should not be octahedral but apparently are. Are these really failures or does the discrepancy lie with the fact that the experimental structures correspond to the solid rather than the gas phase (isolated molecules)?

a. Obtain equilibrium geometries for linear CaF2 and SrCl2 and also calculate vibrational frequencies (infrared spectra). Use the HF/3-21G model, which has actually proven to be quite successful in describing the structures of main-group inorganic molecules. Are the linear structures for CaF2 and SrCl2 actually energy minima? Elaborate. If one or both are not, repeat your optimization starting with a bent geometry.

b. Obtain equilibrium geometries for octahedral SeF2−6 and TeCl2−6 and also calculate vibrational frequencies. Use the HF/3-21G model. Are the octahedral structures for SeF2−6 and TeCl2−6 actually energy minima? Elaborate. If one or both are not, repeat your optimization starting with distorted structures (preferably with C1 symmetry).

Fantastic news! We've Found the answer you've been seeking!

Step by Step Answer:

Related Book For  book-img-for-question

Physical Chemistry

ISBN: 978-0321812001

3rd edition

Authors: Thomas Engel, Philip Reid

Question Posted: