MAYER v. BELICHICK 605 F.3d 223 (3rd Cir.) Season ticket-holder brought action against the New England...
Fantastic news! We've Found the answer you've been seeking!
Question:
Transcribed Image Text:
MAYER v. BELICHICK 605 F.3d 223 (3rd Cir.) Season ticket-holder brought action against the New England Patriots and league, alleging various causes of action, including tortuous interference with contract as well as causes of action under consumer fraud and deceptive practice statutes, arising out of the team's alleged practice of surreptitiously videotaping the sig- nals of opposing teams. The United States District Court for the District of New Jersey granted defendant's motions to dismiss, and the ticketholder appeale COWEN, Circuit Judge Plaintiff Carl J. Mayer appeals from the order of the United States District Court for the District of New Jersey granting the respective motions to dismiss filed by Defendants Bill Belichick and the New England Patriots ("Patriots") as well as by Defendant National Football League ("NFL"). We will affirm. 1. This highly unusual case was filed by a disap- pointed football fan and season ticket-holder in response to the so-called "Spygate" scandal. This scandal arose when it was discovered that the Patri- ots were surreptitiously videotaping the signals of their opponents. Mayer, a New Jersey resident and New York Jets season ticket-holder, initially filed his complaint on September 7, 2007. He named as Defendants the Patriots, headquartered in Massachusetts, as well as the team's head coach, Belichick, a Massachusetts resident. Mayer even- Massachusetts, as well as the team's head coach, Belichick, a Massachusetts resident. Mayer even- tually filed an amended complaint on August 19, 2008, which added the NFL, with its headquarters in New York, as a Defendant. We, like the Dis- trict Court before us, must look to the amended complaint, accepting its well pleaded factual alle- gations as true for purposes of this appeal. The Preliminary Statement of the Case section of this extensive pleading provided a fair description of the gist of Mayer's case, at least against the Patri- ots and Belichick: 2. This case is brought by a New York Jets season ticket-holder on behalf of all similarly situated New York Jets season ticket-holders and other New York Jets ticket-holders against the Defen- dant New England Patriots and their coach, Defendant Bill Belichick. The core of this action is that the Defendants, during a game with the New York Jets on September 9, 2007, instructed 96 t r O V ti pla Ru par on an agent of the Defendants to surreptitiously vid- eotape the New York Jets coaches and players c the field with the purpose of illegally recording, capturing and stealing the New York Jets signals and visual coaching instructions. The Defendants were in fact subsequently found by the National Football League ("NFL") to have improperly engaged in such conduct. This violated the con- tractual expectations and rights of New York Jets ticket-holders who fully anticipated and con- tracted for a ticket to observe an honest match played in compliance with all laws, regulations and NFL rules. anisla, priboste daildst.ol At their most fundamental level, the various claims alleged here arose out of the repeated and surreptitious violations of a specific NFL rule. This rule provides that "no video recording devices of any kind are per- mitted to be in use in the coaches' booth, on the field, or in the locker room during the game"" and that "all video for coaching purposes must be shot from loca- tions 'enclosed on all sides with a roof overhead."" On September 9, 2007, the Jets and the Patriots played the season opener in Giants Stadium, East Rutherford, New Jersey. Mayer possessed tickets and parking passes to this game, and the Patriots ultimately >> CASE QUESTIONS 1. What was the legal basis for Mayer's claims? 2. What does it mean when the court holds that "Mayer failed to set forth a legally cognizable right, interest, or injury"? 3. Why did the District Court and the Third Circuit dismiss Mayer's claims? MAYER v. BELICHICK 605 F.3d 223 (3rd Cir.) Season ticket-holder brought action against the New England Patriots and league, alleging various causes of action, including tortuous interference with contract as well as causes of action under consumer fraud and deceptive practice statutes, arising out of the team's alleged practice of surreptitiously videotaping the sig- nals of opposing teams. The United States District Court for the District of New Jersey granted defendant's motions to dismiss, and the ticketholder appeale COWEN, Circuit Judge Plaintiff Carl J. Mayer appeals from the order of the United States District Court for the District of New Jersey granting the respective motions to dismiss filed by Defendants Bill Belichick and the New England Patriots ("Patriots") as well as by Defendant National Football League ("NFL"). We will affirm. 1. This highly unusual case was filed by a disap- pointed football fan and season ticket-holder in response to the so-called "Spygate" scandal. This scandal arose when it was discovered that the Patri- ots were surreptitiously videotaping the signals of their opponents. Mayer, a New Jersey resident and New York Jets season ticket-holder, initially filed his complaint on September 7, 2007. He named as Defendants the Patriots, headquartered in Massachusetts, as well as the team's head coach, Belichick, a Massachusetts resident. Mayer even- Massachusetts, as well as the team's head coach, Belichick, a Massachusetts resident. Mayer even- tually filed an amended complaint on August 19, 2008, which added the NFL, with its headquarters in New York, as a Defendant. We, like the Dis- trict Court before us, must look to the amended complaint, accepting its well pleaded factual alle- gations as true for purposes of this appeal. The Preliminary Statement of the Case section of this extensive pleading provided a fair description of the gist of Mayer's case, at least against the Patri- ots and Belichick: 2. This case is brought by a New York Jets season ticket-holder on behalf of all similarly situated New York Jets season ticket-holders and other New York Jets ticket-holders against the Defen- dant New England Patriots and their coach, Defendant Bill Belichick. The core of this action is that the Defendants, during a game with the New York Jets on September 9, 2007, instructed 96 t r O V ti pla Ru par on an agent of the Defendants to surreptitiously vid- eotape the New York Jets coaches and players c the field with the purpose of illegally recording, capturing and stealing the New York Jets signals and visual coaching instructions. The Defendants were in fact subsequently found by the National Football League ("NFL") to have improperly engaged in such conduct. This violated the con- tractual expectations and rights of New York Jets ticket-holders who fully anticipated and con- tracted for a ticket to observe an honest match played in compliance with all laws, regulations and NFL rules. anisla, priboste daildst.ol At their most fundamental level, the various claims alleged here arose out of the repeated and surreptitious violations of a specific NFL rule. This rule provides that "no video recording devices of any kind are per- mitted to be in use in the coaches' booth, on the field, or in the locker room during the game"" and that "all video for coaching purposes must be shot from loca- tions 'enclosed on all sides with a roof overhead."" On September 9, 2007, the Jets and the Patriots played the season opener in Giants Stadium, East Rutherford, New Jersey. Mayer possessed tickets and parking passes to this game, and the Patriots ultimately >> CASE QUESTIONS 1. What was the legal basis for Mayer's claims? 2. What does it mean when the court holds that "Mayer failed to set forth a legally cognizable right, interest, or injury"? 3. Why did the District Court and the Third Circuit dismiss Mayer's claims?
Expert Answer:
Answer rating: 100% (QA)
1 Mayers claims were based on the NFLs rules regarding the use of video recording devices The NFLs r... View the full answer
Related Book For
Behavioral Finance Psychology Decision-Making and Markets
ISBN: 978-0324661170
1st edition
Authors: Lucy Ackert
Posted Date:
Students also viewed these law questions
-
The norm of a linear transformation TA: Rn Rn can be defined by where the maximum is taken over all nonzero x in Rn. (The subscript indicates that the norm of the linear transformation on the left is...
-
Suppose that f: Rn R and g: Rn Rn are differentiable on Rn and that there exist r > 0 and a Rn such that Dg(x) is the identity matrix, I, for all x Br(a). Prove that there is a function h: Br(a) {a}...
-
Let 5: Rn Rn and T: Rn Rn be linear transformations with matrices A and B respectively. [Theorem 3.] (a) Show that B2 = B if and only if T2 = 7 (where T2 means T o T). (b) Show that B2 = 1 if and...
-
Pew Research published survey results from two random samples. Both samples were asked, Have you listened to an audio book in the last year? The results are shown in the table below. a. Find and...
-
Together, one 8-oz serving of plain nonfat yogurt and one 1-oz serving of Swiss cheese contain 676 mg of calcium. The yogurt contains 4 mg more than twice the calcium in the cheese. Find the calcium...
-
Bottoms Up Diaper Service is considering the purchase of a new industrial washer. It can purchase the washer for $6,000 and sell its old washer for $2,000. The new washer will last for 6 years and...
-
Use It's lemma to express \(d F\) given that \(F(x)=x^{1 / 2}\), where the stochastic process \(\left\{S_{t}, t \geq 0 ight\}\) satisfies the stochastic differential equation \[d...
-
A pistoncylinder device initially contains 1.2 kg of air at 700 kPa and 200°C. At this state, the piston is touching on a pair of stops. The mass of the piston is such that 600- kPa pressure is...
-
Microchip began the year with $2,600 in its asset account, supplies. During the year, $7,100 in supplies were purchased and debited to supplies. At year-end, supplies costing $3,550 remain on hand....
-
Enter the following sales transaction into the Ledger/Journal. You have negotiated the sale of Mr and Mr Emerald's home at 8 Knowle Court, Ocean Grove for $1,000 000. The purchasers, Mr and Mrs Teal...
-
Wheeler's Bike Company manufactures custom racing bicycles. The company uses a job order cost system to determine the cost of each bike. Estimated costs and expenses for the coming year follow:...
-
Use the following information on call and put options for Facebook to answer the questions. a. What is the intrinsic value of the call option that expires in April and has a $17 strike price? b. What...
-
Match the following terms and concepts to the appropriate explanations that follow: International Accounting Standards Board Translation Remeasurement Convergence Reporting currency Local currency...
-
Roll Call manufactures a unique key chain with a built-in radio frequency identification chip. This device is issued to students at State University, and a host computer tracks student attendance at...
-
Three of the following statements are patently false. Find the three false statements. The other statements are true, and may include additional insights beyond those mentioned in the textbook....
-
Suppose a candidate who runs on a platform of soak the rich wins the 2016 presidential election. After being elected, he or she persuades Congress to raise the top marginal tax rate on the federal...
-
How long will it take $5,000 to grow to $10,000 at 8% a year simple interest? Round your final answer to the nearest year and month. years and months
-
By referring to Figure 13.18, determine the mass of each of the following salts required to form a saturated solution in 250 g of water at 30 oC: (a) KClO3, (b) Pb(NO3)2, (c) Ce2(SO4)3.
-
What do experimental bubble markets teach us about the likelihood of bubbles in the real world? In what sense does this research have its limitations?
-
In a regression of perceived long-term investment value (LTIV) on size (S), book to market (B/M), and management quality (MQ), the following coefficients (all significant) were estimated: LTIV = -.86...
-
What does research based on the game show Deal or No Deal tell us about path-dependence and integration vs. segregation of gambles?
-
Input information from the SBA Personal Financial Statements given to Sharptop Bank into a spreadsheet. a. Separate personal items (e.g., residence) from business items (e.g., inventory). b....
-
Compare your recalculated ending inventory to that given to Sharptop Bank and to Southern Appalachian Insurance. Is either estimated ending inventory materially different from that reported on the...
-
What accuracy certifications on the tax return and bank financial statement address providing materially inaccurate information?
Study smarter with the SolutionInn App