In June 2014, Medtronic, a Minneapolis-based medical device manufacturer, announced that it would join the tax-inversion...
Fantastic news! We've Found the answer you've been seeking!
Question:
Transcribed Image Text:
In June 2014, Medtronic, a Minneapolis-based medical device manufacturer, announced that it would join the tax-inversion acquisition parade. A tax-inversion acquisition occurs when a corporation acquires a target firm based in a lower-tax country and, as part of the transaction, moves its legal headquarters to the target firm's nation. After making this move, the combined corporation's taxes are based on the lower rate of its new home country. This move is perfectly legal according to U.S. law as long as the target firm's shareholders own at least 20 percent of the combined firm. About 50 U.S. corporations have undertaken tax inversions over the last 10 years, but the rate of occurrence appears to be increasing. Medtronic acquired Covidien, an Irish-based medical equipment manufacturer. in January 2015 for $49.9 billion, and moved its legal home to Ireland. Not much else changed. Medtronic kept its corporate headquarters in Minneapolis. But Medtronic benefits from the move in two primary ways. First, while the tax rate on profits of U.S. corporations is 35 percent, the tax rate on Ireland-based corporate profits is only 12.5 percent. Additionally, the United States is one of only six developed economies that tax the global profits of corporations. If a multinational corporation makes profits in a foreign country, the firm pays taxes on those profits to the foreign government at the rate the foreign country charges. For corporations based in most countries, that is the end of their tax obligations. However, if a U.S.-based firm wants to bring those profits back to its home country either to invest in new facilities or to distribute dividends to its stockholders, it has to pay income tax on the profits earned in foreign markets. The rate the firm pays is the difference in the tax rate in the foreign country and the U.S. rate. For example, if Medtronic earned income in Ireland and then repatriated the profits to the United States, it would face a 22.5 percent additional tax rate, the difference between the U.S. and Irish corporate tax rates. Since Medtronic has accumulated $13 billion in earned profits abroad, it could face $3.5 billion to $4 billion in taxes if it brought those profits home. Thus, corporations, such as Medtronic, undertake tax inversions to save on taxes and, by extension, benefit their shareholders by being able to invest more in the firm to help it grow and/or return higher levels of dividends to shareholders. Critics, however, point out that these firms are choosing not to pay taxes at the U.S. rates even though they have benefited and will continue to benefit from being American corporations. While inverters change their legal residence, they typically keep their corporate headquarters in the United States and stay listed on a U.S. stock exchange. As a result, they benefit from America's deep financial markets, military might, intellectual property rights and other legal protections, intellectual and physical infrastructure, substantial human capital base, and national research programs. For example, Medtronic won $484 million in contracts with the U.S. government in recent years and plans to complete these contracts even though it will no longer be an American company, it hires students from top-notch American universities; and it files patents for all of its new technologies in the United States. Critics see the decision to move to a lower-tax country as unethical and unpatriotic. Jack Lew, the former U.S. Treasury secretary, echoed this perspective when he stated. "We should prevent companies from effectively renouncing their citizenship to get out of paying taxes. What we need is a new sense of economic patriotism, where we all rise and fall together." Discussion Questions 1. Was Medtronic justified in moving its legal home to Ireland? 2. How should firms balance the desire to limit taxes to maximize cash generation with the need to be a good corporate citizen? 3. How should the U.S. government respond to the increasing frequency of tax inversions? Sources: Vivanco, F. 2015. Medtronic completes acquisition of Covidien. www.newsroom.medtronic.com, January 25: np: Sloan, A. 2014. Positively un-American. fortune.com, July 7: np: McKinnon, J. 2014. Obama administration urges immediate action on "inversion." wsj. com, July 15: np: Sahadi, J. 2014. When U.S. companies dodge taxes, is it unpatriotic? finance.yahoo.com, July 23: np: Anonymous. 2014. Medtronic's tax inversion lesson.wsj.com, August 13: np: and Gleckman, H. 2014. The tax-shopping backstory of the Medtronic- Covidien inversion. forbes.com, June 17: np. In June 2014, Medtronic, a Minneapolis-based medical device manufacturer, announced that it would join the tax-inversion acquisition parade. A tax-inversion acquisition occurs when a corporation acquires a target firm based in a lower-tax country and, as part of the transaction, moves its legal headquarters to the target firm's nation. After making this move, the combined corporation's taxes are based on the lower rate of its new home country. This move is perfectly legal according to U.S. law as long as the target firm's shareholders own at least 20 percent of the combined firm. About 50 U.S. corporations have undertaken tax inversions over the last 10 years, but the rate of occurrence appears to be increasing. Medtronic acquired Covidien, an Irish-based medical equipment manufacturer. in January 2015 for $49.9 billion, and moved its legal home to Ireland. Not much else changed. Medtronic kept its corporate headquarters in Minneapolis. But Medtronic benefits from the move in two primary ways. First, while the tax rate on profits of U.S. corporations is 35 percent, the tax rate on Ireland-based corporate profits is only 12.5 percent. Additionally, the United States is one of only six developed economies that tax the global profits of corporations. If a multinational corporation makes profits in a foreign country, the firm pays taxes on those profits to the foreign government at the rate the foreign country charges. For corporations based in most countries, that is the end of their tax obligations. However, if a U.S.-based firm wants to bring those profits back to its home country either to invest in new facilities or to distribute dividends to its stockholders, it has to pay income tax on the profits earned in foreign markets. The rate the firm pays is the difference in the tax rate in the foreign country and the U.S. rate. For example, if Medtronic earned income in Ireland and then repatriated the profits to the United States, it would face a 22.5 percent additional tax rate, the difference between the U.S. and Irish corporate tax rates. Since Medtronic has accumulated $13 billion in earned profits abroad, it could face $3.5 billion to $4 billion in taxes if it brought those profits home. Thus, corporations, such as Medtronic, undertake tax inversions to save on taxes and, by extension, benefit their shareholders by being able to invest more in the firm to help it grow and/or return higher levels of dividends to shareholders. Critics, however, point out that these firms are choosing not to pay taxes at the U.S. rates even though they have benefited and will continue to benefit from being American corporations. While inverters change their legal residence, they typically keep their corporate headquarters in the United States and stay listed on a U.S. stock exchange. As a result, they benefit from America's deep financial markets, military might, intellectual property rights and other legal protections, intellectual and physical infrastructure, substantial human capital base, and national research programs. For example, Medtronic won $484 million in contracts with the U.S. government in recent years and plans to complete these contracts even though it will no longer be an American company, it hires students from top-notch American universities; and it files patents for all of its new technologies in the United States. Critics see the decision to move to a lower-tax country as unethical and unpatriotic. Jack Lew, the former U.S. Treasury secretary, echoed this perspective when he stated. "We should prevent companies from effectively renouncing their citizenship to get out of paying taxes. What we need is a new sense of economic patriotism, where we all rise and fall together." Discussion Questions 1. Was Medtronic justified in moving its legal home to Ireland? 2. How should firms balance the desire to limit taxes to maximize cash generation with the need to be a good corporate citizen? 3. How should the U.S. government respond to the increasing frequency of tax inversions? Sources: Vivanco, F. 2015. Medtronic completes acquisition of Covidien. www.newsroom.medtronic.com, January 25: np: Sloan, A. 2014. Positively un-American. fortune.com, July 7: np: McKinnon, J. 2014. Obama administration urges immediate action on "inversion." wsj. com, July 15: np: Sahadi, J. 2014. When U.S. companies dodge taxes, is it unpatriotic? finance.yahoo.com, July 23: np: Anonymous. 2014. Medtronic's tax inversion lesson.wsj.com, August 13: np: and Gleckman, H. 2014. The tax-shopping backstory of the Medtronic- Covidien inversion. forbes.com, June 17: np.
Expert Answer:
Answer rating: 100% (QA)
Ethically speaking Medtronic is justified in moving its legal home to Ireland According to the Utilitarian ethical theory an act is considered morally ... View the full answer
Related Book For
Canadian Income Taxation planning and decision making
ISBN: 9781259094330
17th edition 2014-2015 version
Authors: Joan Kitunen, William Buckwold
Posted Date:
Students also viewed these economics questions
-
Selco, a U.S. Company, imports and exports tools, shop equipment, and industrial construction supplies. The company uses a periodic inventory system. During April the company entered into the...
-
When the tax rates in a foreign country are lower than Canadian tax rates, will the use of a foreign branch structure to conduct the Canadian entitys foreign activities be advantageous? Explain.
-
Corporate ethics and fraud have received much media attention through reporting of scandals at major corporations. Salem wants to make sure that its financial reporting and tax reporting...
-
The inequality describes the range of monthly average temperatures T in degrees Fahrenheit at a certain location. (a) Solve the inequality. (b) If the high and low monthly average temperatures...
-
Use the given degree of confidence and sample data to find (a) The margin of error (b) The confidence interval for the population mean . Cost of basic phone service: 92% confidence; n = 64, =...
-
In Example 3, does it make any difference in which order the selection operations are performed? That is, if we select a jacket color first and then select a size, are there as many combined choices...
-
World Series Champs As of this writing, the New York Yankees were the last team to win the World Series, and the numbers of the starting lineup are 2, 18, 25, 13, 20, 55, 24, 33, and 53. The average...
-
On April 8, 2010, a flood destroyed the warehouse of Stuco Distributing Co. From the waterlogged records of the company, management was able to determine that the firms gross profit ratio had...
-
Sister Tool Co. is considering investing in specialized equipment costing $612,000. The equipment has a useful life of five years and a residual value of $68,000. Depreciation is calculated using the...
-
The following adjusted revenue and expense accounts appeared in the accounting records of Pashi, Inc., an accrual basis taxpayer, for the year ended December 31, Year 2. Revenues Net sales $3,000,000...
-
Select all the strings that are legal according to regular expression . | | | ::= . = | := | (e|E) (+|-|e) = f|F|d| D | ( ( |_)* ) :=0|1|2|3|4|5|6|7|8|9 0 | OD None of the given alternatives are...
-
In your opinion, what is the usefulness of doing a business system analysis when considering whether to invest in a country?
-
What are two situations in which unauthorized signatures arise?
-
The ordinary business of Ace Credit Company is to lend funds to consumers. Ace must disclose all credit terms clearly and conspicuously in a. no credit transaction. b. any credit transaction in which...
-
Every person who possesses an instrument is a holder. (True/False)
-
How would you recommend an American manager plan a negotiation with a Japanese counterpart?
-
Consider transmission of voice over the internet using the following settings/protocols: VoIP codec used: G.711 (64,000 bps). Sent inside RTP packets, with the shortest possible 12-byte headers 3...
-
Subprime loans have higher loss rates than many other types of loans. Explain why lenders offer subprime loans. Describe the characteristics of the typical borrower in a subprime consumer loan.
-
Shane Plastics Ltd. is a Canadian-controlled private corporation. All of its outstanding common shares are owned by KS Holdings Ltd., a company owned by Karl Shane. KS Holdings also owns several real...
-
In Year 1, Kayla, an employee of a public company, was granted an option to acquire 100 shares from the companys treasury at a price of $12 per share. At the date that the option was granted, the...
-
Can an individual deduct for tax purposes the amount of regular support payments to a former spouse? Would it matter if that individuals only source of income were from interest on bond investments?...
-
Santinis new contract for 2019 indicates the following compensation and benefits: Santini is 54 years old at the end of 2019. He is single and has no dependents. Assume that the employer matches $1...
-
In 2019, Maggy (34 years old) is an employee of YBU Corp. YBU provides a 401(k) plan for all its employees. According to the terms of the plan, YBU contributes 50 cents for every dollar the employee...
-
In 2019, Nina contributes 10 percent of her $100,000 annual salary to her 401(k) account. She expects to earn a 7 percent before-tax rate of return. Assuming she leaves this (and any employer...
Study smarter with the SolutionInn App