In the late 1970s, supermarkets began to replace paper sacks with polyethylene (plastic) sacks. In the...

   

Transcribed Image Text:

In the late 1970s, supermarkets began to replace paper sacks with polyethylene (plastic) sacks. In the 1980s, a movement to go back to paper arose, primarily inspired by environmental considerations. In the 1990s, a countermovement arose, claiming that paper sacks have a greater negative environmental impact than plastic ones. Following are estimates of the atmospheric emissions and energy consumption associated with the raw materials acquisition and processing (logging, pulping, and papermaking for paper, petroleum production and refining and polymerization for polyethylene) and disposal of sacks, and for the manufacture and use of sacks. Emissions (oz/sack) Energy Consumed (Btu/sack) Plastic Paper Plastic Paper 0.0045 724 Stages Raw materials production plus product disposal 0.0510 Sack production and use 0.0516 0.0146 905 464 Assume that atmospheric emissions and energy consumption do not depend on whether the new sacks are made from fresh raw materials or recycled sacks, and that it takes roughly twice as many plastic sacks as paper sacks to hold a given quantity of groceries. (a) Calculate the air emissions (lbm) and energy consumption (Btu) per 1000 paper sacks used and per 2000 plastic sacks used, assuming that no sacks are recycled. 185 (a) Calculate the air emissions (lbm) and energy consumption (Btu) per 1000 paper sacks used and per 2000 plastic sacks used, assuming that no sacks are recycled. (b) Repeat the calculations of Part a assuming that 60% of the used sacks are recycled. By what percentages are air emissions and energy consumption reduced for each sack material as a consequence of recycling? (c) Estimate the number of grocery sacks used in a day in the United States (population = 320 million), and calculate the average rate of energy consumption (megawatts, MW) associated with the production, use, and disposal of these sacks, assuming that they are plastic and none are recycled. How many MW would be saved by 60% recycling? ANSWER O 431 MW (d) You should have found that both atmospheric emissions and energy consumption are higher when paper is used rather than plastic, although recycling reduces the differences. Nevertheless, deciding to use plastic based entirely on this result could be a serious mistake. List several important factors that were not taken into account in making the decision, including considerations of the potential environmental impact of each type of bag. 7.4 Environmental Application A simplified version of the life cycle of grocery sacks follows. ¹ ---9-8- Acquisition/ production of raw materials Sack production and use Recycled sacks Disposal In the late 1970s, supermarkets began to replace paper sacks with polyethylene (plastic) sacks. In the 1980s, a movement to go back to paper arose, primarily inspired by environmental considerations. In the 1990s, a countermovement arose, claiming that paper sacks have a greater negative environmental impact than plastic ones. Following are estimates of the atmospheric emissions and energy consumption associated with the raw materials acquisition and processing (logging, pulping, and papermaking for paper, petroleum production and refining and polymerization for polyethylene) and disposal of sacks, and for the manufacture and use of sacks. Emissions (oz/sack) Energy Consumed (Btu/sack) Plastic Paper Plastic Paper 0.0045 724 Stages Raw materials production plus product disposal 0.0510 Sack production and use 0.0516 0.0146 905 464 Assume that atmospheric emissions and energy consumption do not depend on whether the new sacks are made from fresh raw materials or recycled sacks, and that it takes roughly twice as many plastic sacks as paper sacks to hold a given quantity of groceries. (a) Calculate the air emissions (lbm) and energy consumption (Btu) per 1000 paper sacks used and per 2000 plastic sacks used, assuming that no sacks are recycled. 185 (a) Calculate the air emissions (lbm) and energy consumption (Btu) per 1000 paper sacks used and per 2000 plastic sacks used, assuming that no sacks are recycled. (b) Repeat the calculations of Part a assuming that 60% of the used sacks are recycled. By what percentages are air emissions and energy consumption reduced for each sack material as a consequence of recycling? (c) Estimate the number of grocery sacks used in a day in the United States (population = 320 million), and calculate the average rate of energy consumption (megawatts, MW) associated with the production, use, and disposal of these sacks, assuming that they are plastic and none are recycled. How many MW would be saved by 60% recycling? ANSWER O 431 MW (d) You should have found that both atmospheric emissions and energy consumption are higher when paper is used rather than plastic, although recycling reduces the differences. Nevertheless, deciding to use plastic based entirely on this result could be a serious mistake. List several important factors that were not taken into account in making the decision, including considerations of the potential environmental impact of each type of bag. 7.4 Environmental Application A simplified version of the life cycle of grocery sacks follows. ¹ ---9-8- Acquisition/ production of raw materials Sack production and use Recycled sacks Disposal In the late 1970s, supermarkets began to replace paper sacks with polyethylene (plastic) sacks. In the 1980s, a movement to go back to paper arose, primarily inspired by environmental considerations. In the 1990s, a countermovement arose, claiming that paper sacks have a greater negative environmental impact than plastic ones. Following are estimates of the atmospheric emissions and energy consumption associated with the raw materials acquisition and processing (logging, pulping, and papermaking for paper, petroleum production and refining and polymerization for polyethylene) and disposal of sacks, and for the manufacture and use of sacks. Emissions (oz/sack) Energy Consumed (Btu/sack) Plastic Paper Plastic Paper 0.0045 724 Stages Raw materials production plus product disposal 0.0510 Sack production and use 0.0516 0.0146 905 464 Assume that atmospheric emissions and energy consumption do not depend on whether the new sacks are made from fresh raw materials or recycled sacks, and that it takes roughly twice as many plastic sacks as paper sacks to hold a given quantity of groceries. (a) Calculate the air emissions (lbm) and energy consumption (Btu) per 1000 paper sacks used and per 2000 plastic sacks used, assuming that no sacks are recycled. 185 (a) Calculate the air emissions (lbm) and energy consumption (Btu) per 1000 paper sacks used and per 2000 plastic sacks used, assuming that no sacks are recycled. (b) Repeat the calculations of Part a assuming that 60% of the used sacks are recycled. By what percentages are air emissions and energy consumption reduced for each sack material as a consequence of recycling? (c) Estimate the number of grocery sacks used in a day in the United States (population = 320 million), and calculate the average rate of energy consumption (megawatts, MW) associated with the production, use, and disposal of these sacks, assuming that they are plastic and none are recycled. How many MW would be saved by 60% recycling? ANSWER O 431 MW (d) You should have found that both atmospheric emissions and energy consumption are higher when paper is used rather than plastic, although recycling reduces the differences. Nevertheless, deciding to use plastic based entirely on this result could be a serious mistake. List several important factors that were not taken into account in making the decision, including considerations of the potential environmental impact of each type of bag. 7.4 Environmental Application A simplified version of the life cycle of grocery sacks follows. ¹ ---9-8- Acquisition/ production of raw materials Sack production and use Recycled sacks Disposal In the late 1970s, supermarkets began to replace paper sacks with polyethylene (plastic) sacks. In the 1980s, a movement to go back to paper arose, primarily inspired by environmental considerations. In the 1990s, a countermovement arose, claiming that paper sacks have a greater negative environmental impact than plastic ones. Following are estimates of the atmospheric emissions and energy consumption associated with the raw materials acquisition and processing (logging, pulping, and papermaking for paper, petroleum production and refining and polymerization for polyethylene) and disposal of sacks, and for the manufacture and use of sacks. Emissions (oz/sack) Energy Consumed (Btu/sack) Plastic Paper Plastic Paper 0.0045 724 Stages Raw materials production plus product disposal 0.0510 Sack production and use 0.0516 0.0146 905 464 Assume that atmospheric emissions and energy consumption do not depend on whether the new sacks are made from fresh raw materials or recycled sacks, and that it takes roughly twice as many plastic sacks as paper sacks to hold a given quantity of groceries. (a) Calculate the air emissions (lbm) and energy consumption (Btu) per 1000 paper sacks used and per 2000 plastic sacks used, assuming that no sacks are recycled. 185 (a) Calculate the air emissions (lbm) and energy consumption (Btu) per 1000 paper sacks used and per 2000 plastic sacks used, assuming that no sacks are recycled. (b) Repeat the calculations of Part a assuming that 60% of the used sacks are recycled. By what percentages are air emissions and energy consumption reduced for each sack material as a consequence of recycling? (c) Estimate the number of grocery sacks used in a day in the United States (population = 320 million), and calculate the average rate of energy consumption (megawatts, MW) associated with the production, use, and disposal of these sacks, assuming that they are plastic and none are recycled. How many MW would be saved by 60% recycling? ANSWER O 431 MW (d) You should have found that both atmospheric emissions and energy consumption are higher when paper is used rather than plastic, although recycling reduces the differences. Nevertheless, deciding to use plastic based entirely on this result could be a serious mistake. List several important factors that were not taken into account in making the decision, including considerations of the potential environmental impact of each type of bag. 7.4 Environmental Application A simplified version of the life cycle of grocery sacks follows. ¹ ---9-8- Acquisition/ production of raw materials Sack production and use Recycled sacks Disposal

Answer rating: 100% (QA)

aAir emissions lb1000 sacks 0051 Energy consumption Btu1000 sacks 724 bAir emiss... View the full answer