Alan Vitt purchased an iBook G4 laptop computer from Apple, Inc. Shortly after the one- year warranty expired, the laptop failed to work due to a weakness in the product manufacture. Vitt sued Apple, arguing that the laptop should have lasted “at least a couple of years,” which Vitt believed was a reason-able consumer expectation for a laptop. Vitt claimed that Apple’s descriptions of the laptop as “ durable,” “ rugged,” “ reliable,” and “ high performance” were affirmative statements concerning the quality and performance of the lap-top, which Apple did not meet. How should the court rule? Why?
Answer to relevant QuestionsBariven, S. A., agreed to buy 26,000 metric tons of powdered milk for $ 123.5 million from Absolute Trading Corp. to be delivered in shipments from China to Venezuela. After the first three shipments, China halted dairy ...Juridica Investments, Ltd. (JIL), entered into a financing contract with S & T Oil Equipment & Machinery, Ltd., a U. S. company. The contract included an arbitration provision stating that any disputes would be arbitrated ...In 1954, the government of Bolivia began expropriating land from Francisco Loza for public projects, including an international airport. The government directed the payment of compensation in exchange for at least some of ...Eligio Gaitan borrowed the funds to buy real property in Downers Grove, Illinois, and signed a note payable to Encore Credit Corp. Encore indorsed the note in blank. Later, when Gaitan defaulted on the payments, an action to ...1. If the court had accepted Chauvin’s claim that Mills’s funds represented an investment, would the result in this case have been different? Explain. 2. Do the facts in this case support the court’s conclusion that ...
Post your question