Peter and Tanya Rothing operated Diamond R Stables near Belgrade, Montana, where they bred, trained, and sold horses. Arnold Kallestad owned a ranch in Gallatin County, Montana, where he grew hay and grain, and raised Red Angus cattle. For more than twenty years, Kallestad had sold between three hundred and one thousand tons of hay annually, sometimes advertising it for sale in the Bozeman Daily Chronicle. In 2001, the Rothings bought hay from Kallestad for $ 90 a ton. They received delivery on April 23. In less than two weeks, at least nine of the Rothings’ horses exhibited symptoms of poisoning that was diagnosed as botulism. Before the outbreak was over, nineteen animals had died. Robert Whitlock, associate professor of medicine and the director of the Botulism Laboratory at the University of Pennsylvania, concluded that Kallestad’s hay was the source. The Rothings filed a suit in a Montana state court against Kallestad, claiming, in part, breach of the implied warranty of merchantability. Kallestad asked the court to dismiss this claim on the ground that, if botulism had been present, it had been in no way foreseeable. Should the court grant this request? Why or why not?
Answer to relevant QuestionsAlan Vitt purchased an iBook G4 laptop computer from Apple, Inc. Shortly after the one- year warranty expired, the laptop failed to work due to a weakness in the product manufacture. Vitt sued Apple, arguing that the laptop ...1. How is the principle of comity applied? 2. What considerations can take precedence over comity? 3. What interests were at stake in the dispute at the heart of this case? 4. Did this court apply the principle of comity? ...Technology Incubation and Entrepreneurship Training Society (TIETS) entered into a joint- venture agreement with Mandana Farhang and M. A. Mobile to develop and market certain technology for commercial purposes. Farhang and ...Michael Scotto borrowed $ 2,970 from Cindy Vinueza. Both of their signatures appeared at the bottom of a note that stated, “I Michael Scotto owe Cindy Vinueza $ 2,970 (two thousand and nine- hundred & seventy dollars) & ...WHAT IF THE FACTS WERE DIFFERENT? Suppose that the name Pyramid Title, LLC, had not been included on the face of the check. Would Peoples have been personally liable for payment of the check in that situation? Why or why ...
Post your question