Question: As described in the Mini Case Available for a Song Shiller
As described in the Mini-Case “Available for a Song,” Shiller and Waldfogel (2011) estimated that if iTunes used two-part pricing charging an annual access fee and a low price per song, it would raise its profit by about 30% relative to what it would earn using uniform pricing or variable pricing. Assume that iTunes uses two-part pricing and assume that the marginal cost of an additional download is zero. How should iTunes set its profit-maximizing price per song if all consumers are identical? Illustrate profit-maximizing two- part pricing in a diagram for the identical consumer case. Explain why the actual profit- maximizing price per song is positive.
Answer to relevant QuestionsA monopoly sells two products, of which any given consumer wants to buy only one (and places no value on the other good). If the monopoly can prevent resale, can it increase its profit by bundling the goods, forcing ...Based on the information in Question, determine the profit- maximizing uniform price. Does Paradise Cruises earn a higher profit under peak- load pricing or uniform pricing? Compare consumer surplus under these two pricing ...What is the homogeneous- good duopoly’s Nash- Cournot equilibrium if the market demand function is Q = 1,000 – 1,000p and each firm’s marginal cost is $ 0.28 per unit?To examine the trade- off between efficiency and market power from a merger, consider a market with two firms that sell identical products. Firm 1 has a constant marginal cost of 1, and Firm 2 has a constant marginal cost of ...What is the effect on prices and the number of firms under monopolistic competition if a government subsidy is introduced that reduces the fixed cost of each firm in the industry?
Post your question