Cider Mills, a limited partnership, was continued after the dissolution date for purposes of winding up. The partnership had entered into a contract for the sale of land three months prior to its dissolution date. The property was sold after the dissolution date. The parties disagreed as to the order in which payments would be made following the dissolution of the partnership. The limited partners argued that they should share in the profits from the sale. The court determined that the order of payment should be creditors, limited partners, general partners. Anthony Pappas, a limited partner, objected to the court's decision regarding the distribution of partnership assets. Do you think the court's decision was reversed on appeal? Why or why not?
Answer to relevant QuestionsRichard H. Pettingell and Joseph A. Regan withdrew as partners from the Boston law fi rm of Morrison, Mahoney, & Miller. They brought an action to receive funds that they believed were due to them for voluntarily withdrawing ...The Vancouver Group is made up of five investors, Pietz, Wynne, Fordham, Indermuehle, and Smith. The group entered into a partnership with Robert Berry for the joint purchase of the Sundance Hotel and Casino. The group and ...How is an ultra vires act related to a corporation's powers? Atul Bhagat was an employee of Nvidia Corporation. Nvidia successfully competed for a multimillion-dollar contract to develop the X-box video game console for Microsoft. Nvidia's CEO sent a companywide e-mail announcing that ...Anthony Romeo was an openly gay student at Seton Hall, a Catholic university. He claimed that he elected to attend Seton Hall in part because of its published antidiscrimination policy. In 2003, he applied to the Seton Hall ...
Post your question