Dan and Lori Cole operated a Curves franchise exercise facility in Angola, Indiana, as a partnership. The firm leased commercial space from Flying Cat, LLC, for a renewable three-year term and renewed the lease for a second three- year term. But two years after the renewal, the Coles divorced. By the end of the second term, Flying Cat was owed more than $ 21,000 on the lease. Without telling the landlord about the divorce, Lori signed another extension. More rent went unpaid. Flying Cat obtained a judgment in an Indiana state court against the partnership for almost $ 50,000. Can Dan be held liable? Why or why not?
Answer to relevant Questions1. Might there be any repercussions against small businesses because of recent decisions in their favor in cases involving cyber theft? 2. Why is it so difficult for banks to recover funds stolen online from their ...Greener Delivery Company and Hiway Trucking, Inc., form a business trust. Insta Equipment Company and Jiffy Supply Corporation form a joint stock company. Kwik Mart, Inc., and Luscious Produce, Inc., form an incorporated ...The Ethical DimensionShould the Brennan brothers be held personally liable because they misled their attorneys? Why or why not?The Economic DimensionDo corporations benefit from shareholders’ limited liability? If so, how?1. How many shareholders were present at the shareholders’ meeting that gave rise to the dispute in this case? 2. How did the court “characterize” and “classify” the shares of stock that Cale and Shirley Case held ...In 2004, the Watergate Hotel in Washington, D. C., obtained a loan from PB Capital. At this time, hotel employees were represented by a union, and under a collective bargaining agreement, the hotel agreed to make ...
Post your question