# Question

Fifteen observations on the time to failure of a unit are as follows: 173, 235, 379, 439, 462, 455, 617, 41, 454, 1083, 371, 359, 588, 121, and 1066. Is the Weibull distribution a reasonable choice for the time to failure distribution? Estimate the scale and shape parameters.

## Answer to relevant Questions

Most of the quality management literature state that without top management leadership, quality improvement will not occur. Do you agree or disagree with this statement? Discuss why. Consider the following 20 observations on time to failure: 702, 507, 664, 491, 514, 323, 350, 681, 281, 599, 495, 254, 185, 608, 626, 622, 790, 248, 610, and 537. Is either exponential or the Weibull a reasonable choice of ...A simple series system in shown in the accompanying figure. The lifetime of each component is exponentially distributed and the for each component is shown in the figure. Assuming that the components operate ...A component in an automobile door latch has an exponential time to failure distribution with cycles. What are the mean and variance of the number of cycles to failure? What is the reliability at 8,000 cycles? Suppose that units are placed on test and that three of them fail at 150, 300, and 500 hours, respectively. The test is terminated at 2,000 hours, and no failed units are replaced during the test. Estimate the MTTF and the ...Post your question

0