Question: One might suppose that the syntactic distinction between unboxed
One might suppose that the syntactic distinction between unboxed links and singly boxed links in semantic networks is unnecessary, because singly boxed links are always attached to categories an inheritance algorithm could simply assume that an unboxed link attached to a category is intended to apply to all members of that category. Show that this argument is fallacious, giving examples of errors that would arise.
Relevant QuestionsDescribe the differences and similarities between problem solving and planning.Explain why dropping negative effects from every action schema in a STRIPS problem results in a relaxed problem.We saw that planning graphs can handle only propositional actions. What if we want to use planning graphs for a problem with variables in the goal, such as At (P1, x) ^ At (P2, x), where x ranges over a finite domain of ...Some people say an advantage of HTN planning is that it can solve problems like “take a round trip from Los Angeles to New York and back” that are hard to express in non-HTN notations because the start and goal states ...The following quotes are from the backs of shampoo bottles. Identify each as an unconditional, conditional, or execution monitoring plan.(a) “Lather, Rinse, Repeat,’(b) “Apply shampoo to scalp and let it remain for ...
Post your question