Question: Reconsider the crystal growth experiment from Exercise 14 12 Suppose that
Reconsider the crystal growth experiment from Exercise 14.12. Suppose that x3 = z is now a noise variable, and that the modified experimental design shown in Table 14E.7 has been conducted. The experimenters want the growth rate to be as large as possible, but they also want the variability transmitted from z to be small. Under what set of conditions is growth greater than 90 with minimum variability achieved?
The design and data are in the Minitab worksheet Ex14-14.MTW.
Answer to relevant QuestionsAn article in Quality Progress (“For Starbucks, It’s in the Bag”, March 2011, pp. 18-23) describes using a central composite design to improve the packaging of one-pound coffee. The objective is to produce an airtight ...Sometimes experimenters prefer to use a spherical central composite design in which the axial distance is a = √k , where k is the number of design factors. Is the spherical design similar to the rotatable design? Are there ...An article by J. J. Pignatiello, Jr. and J. S. Ramberg in the Journal of Quality Technology (Vol. 17, 1985, pp. 198- 206) describes the use of a replicated fractional factorial to investigate the effect of five factors on ...(a) Derive an item-by-item sequential-sampling plan for which p1 = 0.02, a = 0.05, p2 = 0.15, and β = 0.10. (b) Draw the OC curve for this plan. Reconsider the situation described in Exercise 15.1. How many erroneous accounts must be in the batch of accounts for a random sample of size n = 5 to have a probability of at least 0.50 containing the erroneous account?
Post your question