Regression, activity-based costing, choosing cost drivers. Newroute Manufacturing has been using activity-based costing to determine the cost of product X-678. One of the activities, “Inspection,” occurs just before the product is finished. Newroute inspects every 10^th unit, and has been using “number of units inspected” as the cost driver for inspection costs. A significant component of inspection costs is the cost of the test-kit used in each inspection.

Neela McFeen, the line manager, is wondering if inspection labor-hours might be a better cost driver for inspection costs. Neela gathers information for weekly inspection costs, units inspected, and inspection labor-hours as shown below:

Neela runs regressions on each of the possible cost drivers and estimates these cost functions:

Inspection Costs = $1,004 + ($2.02 × Number of units inspected)

Inspection Costs = $626 + ($19.51 × Inspection labor-hours)

1. Explain why number of units inspected and inspection labor-hours are plausible cost drivers of inspection costs.

2. Plot the data and regression line for units inspected and inspection costs. Plot the data and regression line for inspection labor-hours and inspection costs. Which cost driver of inspection costs would you choose? Explain.

3. Neela expects inspectors to work 150 hours next period and to inspect 1,200 units. Using the cost driver you chose in requirement 2, what amount of inspection costs should Neela budget? Explain any implications of Neela choosing the cost driver you did not choose in requirement 2 to budget inspection costs.

Transcribed Image Text:

Units Inspected 1,500 500 1,800 2,500 2,200 Inspection Labor-Hours Inspection Costs Week 1 200 80 240 250 220 $3,900 2,000 4,700 6,000 5,500 2,600 3,100 2 3 90 120 800 1,000