Russello was a member of an arson ring consisting of arsonists, insurance adjusters, and property owners. A group member would buy a building, the arsonists would burn it, and the insurance adjusters would help the owner recover inflated insurance awards. The group members would then share in the proceeds. During one period of time, the group burned several buildings. Russello, who owned a professional building in Tampa, Florida, arranged for his building to be burned and then settled with the insurance company, receiving $ 350,000, the highest amount possible. Russello in turn invested the money in legitimate enterprises. The federal government brought criminal RICO charges against Russello. A U. S. district court found Russello guilty and ordered forfeiture of the insurance proceeds. A U. S. court of appeals affirmed the lower court judgment. Russello appealed to the U. S. Supreme Court. Are the insurance proceeds obtained by Russello subject to forfeiture under the criminal RICO statute?
Answer to relevant QuestionsTwo police officers were patrolling an area where drug trafficking had been reported. They spotted an automobile driven by Johnson circling in the area and observed that the car had a broken taillight. The officers pulled ...Marks was meeting her sister and a friend for dinner at a swanky restaurant. It was a warm summer evening, and because she was early, Marks decided to wait outside. She stood in front of the restaurant until her sister and ...Hairston purchased and took delivery of a new car from Haygood Lincoln- Mercury. As he drove home from the Lincoln- Mercury dealership, the left rear wheel came off the car. Because there was no shoulder on the road, he ...Berger, a firefighter, responded to a chemical boil- over at Lipson’s chemical manufacturing plant, the boil- over having been caused by Lipson’s negligence. When Berger arrived on the scene, he asked whether any toxic ...Compare the burden of proof required in a civil case mentioned in this chapter with the burden of proof required in a criminal case as mentioned in Chapter 3. Why do you think a higher burden of proof is required in a ...
Post your question