Question: Several public interest watchdog groups point out pork in the
Several public interest watchdog groups point out “pork” in the federal budget—spending that they claim would have little or no national benefit but would benefit small number of people in a geographically concentrated area. Why are these types of spending more likely to occur in the federal budgeting process than they would if they were each voted on individually?
Answer to relevant QuestionsHow do you think population growth affects the degree of “generational balance” in government finance? Peterson, Hoofer, and Milner (1995) showed that air bag use has led to increases incur crashes. Despite this finding, the government mandates that new cars have airbags, rather than taxing their use. Is this policy a ...Warrenia has two regions. In Oliviland, the marginal benefit associated with pollution cleanup is MB = 300 – 10Q, while in Linn eland, the marginal benefit associated with pollution cleanup is MB = 200 – 4Q. Suppose that ...The National Institute on Drug Abuse describes four-year trends in teenage smoking, drinking, and other drug use on the Web at http://www.nida.nih.gov/infofax/hsyouthtrends.html. According to this site, for which age groups ...Why does Chay and Greenstone’s (2003) approach to measuring the effects of acid rain reduce the identification problems associated with more “traditional “approaches?
Post your question