Courts stick to objective (reasonable person) standards when evaluating offers and acceptances. Juries are not asked to

Question:

Courts stick to objective (reasonable person) standards when evaluating offers and acceptances. Juries are not asked to “get inside someone’s head”, they are instructed to determine what a reasonable person would think of offerors’ and offerees’ statements. Is this practice reasonable? Would it be better if the law directly considered whether people wanted to make contracts?

Fantastic news! We've Found the answer you've been seeking!

Step by Step Answer:

Related Book For  book-img-for-question

Business Law and the Legal Environment

ISBN: 978-1133587491

5th edition

Authors: Jeffrey F. Beatty, Susan S. Samuelson

Question Posted: