Hansen and Richard (1987) show that an arbitrary gross return (1+R_{i}) can be decomposed as where (R^{*},

Question:

Hansen and Richard (1987) show that an arbitrary gross return \(1+R_{i}\) can be decomposed as

image text in transcribed

where \(R^{*}, Z^{*}\), and \(\varepsilon_{i}\) are random variables and \(w_{i}\) is a scalar. This decomposition is orthogonal in the sense that \(\mathrm{E}\left[\left(1+R^{*}ight) Z^{*}ight]=\mathrm{E}\left[\varepsilon_{i}\left(1+R^{*}ight)ight]=\mathrm{E}\left[\varepsilon_{i} Z^{*}ight]=0\). The benchmark return \(1+R^{*} \equiv X^{*} / P\left(X^{*}ight)\) is the gross return on \(X^{*}\), the SDF that is also a payoff, given by (4.35) when the payoff space is finite-dimensional. \(Z^{*} \equiv \operatorname{proj}(1 \mid \underline{Z})\) is the projection of vector 1 (the random variable whose realization equals 1 almost surely) on the space of excess returns, \(\underline{Z}=\{X \in \Xi\) s.t. \(P(X)=0\} .{ }^{16} \varepsilon_{i}\) is a mean-zero residual.
\({ }^{16}\) When the space of excess returns is finite-dimensional, the projection of a variable \(Y\) on the space of excess returns is

image text in transcribed

where \(B\) is a column vector of the basis payoffs of \(\underline{Z}\). It is the excess return that best replicates variable \(Y\) in a least-squares sense.

(a) Show that the benchmark return is the gross return with the minimum second (uncentered) moment. Conclude from this result that, in mean-standard deviation space, \(1+R^{*}\) is the return on the mean-variance frontier that is closest to the origin.

(b) Use the definition of \(Z^{*}\) to show that \(Z^{*}\) is the "mean-generating" excess return in the sense that its second (uncentered) moment with any excess return yields the mean of that return, \(\mathrm{E}[Z]=\mathrm{E}\left[Z^{*} Zight]\) for all \(Z \in \underline{Z}\). Then prove that \(Z^{*}\) is the excess return with the maximum Sharpe ratio in absolute value.

(c) Show that the mean-variance frontier is generated by the set of returns that satisfy \(1+R_{i}=1+R^{*}+w_{i} Z^{*}\) for some scalar \(w_{i}\). Use this result to provide an alternative proof of the mutual-fund theorem of section 2.2.5: any mean-variance efficient return can be generated by any two portfolios on the frontier.

(d) Use the decomposition to show that any mean-variance efficient return \(R_{m v}\), except the global minimum-variance return, can serve as the factor in a single-factor beta pricing model of the form

image text in transcribed

where \(\mathrm{E}\left[R_{m v, z}ight]\) is the zero-beta rate for \(R_{m v}\), defined in section 3.1.2 (for the case where \(R_{m v}=R_{m}\), the market return).

Data from section  2.2.5

image text in transcribed

Data from section 3.1.2

image text in transcribed

Fantastic news! We've Found the answer you've been seeking!

Step by Step Answer:

Question Posted: